From first look to exit, every figure sourced.
Arvam reads a data room or a loan file, extracts every fact with its source passage, computes every figure in code, and writes the memo a committee can act on. Nothing is approved until a person approves it.
- Diligence Analysislive
- Firm Playbooklive
- 100-Day Plan Builderpilot
- Value Realization Ledgerupcoming
- Portfolio Command Centerupcoming
- Exit Story Packageupcoming
- Credit Underwriting Memopilot
- Covenant Monitoringpilot
- Credit Playbookpilot
Private equity firms
Mid-market funds and their deal teams, from the first look at a data room to the exit.
- A diligence memo the investment committee can act on, decided against the fund's own return policy
- The first-100-day plan after closing and the exit case, kept apart from the standalone business
- A playbook read from the firm's past deals, approved rule by rule by a named partner
Private credit lenders
Direct lenders and the credit arms of sponsors, from the loan request to repayment.
- An underwriting memo decided against the lender's policy, with the covenant package read from the agreement as written
- Every reporting period tested in code: headroom, breaches, cures, and a compliance memo the lender can act on
- A lending playbook whose limits replace the standard policy in every underwriting
Both run on the same machinery: every fact extracted with its source, every figure computed in code, every memo approved by a person.
Every figure, sourced
The model never writes a financial number. Every extracted figure is cited to a verbatim passage, every computed figure is arithmetic in code over those inputs, and a citation that does not match its document is rejected by machine.
Graded against real transactions
Stamps.com, 2021: from the data room alone, with the outcome held out of reach, Arvam challenged the announced price by about 42% and landed inside the bank's own DCF range.
Your rules, read from your deals
Arvam reads a firm's past memos and decline notes and drafts the rules they imply, each quoting its source. A named reviewer confirms every one before it is applied; where the record disagrees with itself, it asks.
Consultants leave slides. Vendors leave tools. Arvam leaves the proof.
Arvam claims a process, not infallibility: no number is generated by a model, every number is traceable, every memo is reviewed by a person, and the analysis says when it cannot tell. Abstention is a valid output.